Re: A89: Re: TI89 ROM vs. HP49 ROM

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: TI89 ROM vs. HP49 ROM
From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 23:34:13 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


In a message dated 6/7/99 11:32:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
sirknight@mindless.com writes:

> >>What they would most likely have to do is look at the assembly code
>  >>generated from their C source
>  >
>  >So the 89's ROM was written in C?!
>  >
>  >OK, here is my main questions: was the 89's ROM written in C?  Will 
Version
>  >2.00 be written in assembly?  What will be the major changes in Version
>  >2.00?  If Version 2.00 isn't going to be written in Assembly, will there 
be
>  >some functions written in assembler i.e. 3d graphing.
>  >
>  forget that, I want their compiler and source code!!!  :)


don't hold your breath, man.

Prev: A89: Re: TI89 ROM vs. HP49 ROM
Next: Re: A89: TI89 ROM vs. HP49 ROM
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread