Re: A89: Heeey. . .

Re: A89: Heeey. . .

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: Heeey. . .
• From: ZeromusMog@aol.com
• Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 02:33:04 EDT
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 6/2/99 7:34:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, ericsun@home.com 
writes:

> Well, I'm sure it would be ranked higher if it were listed as a
>  miscellaneous program, instead of a "game." If you consider it a game, as
>  it's listed, then it deserves its rating...if it were a miscellaneous
>  program, then it would probably get something higher.
>  
>  Eric
>  

Since I didn't upload it, I have no control over that. :)
I'll write something or other to request a move or something if I knew who to 
ask... it really isn't a game, or at least the worst one I've seen. It's all 
about the source code. :)

• Re: A89: Heeey. . .
• From: Tim Redmond <tim@calc.org>

• Prev: Re: A89: Heeey. . .
• Next: Re: A89: Heeey. . .
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread