A89: Re: Back to arrays... =(

A89: Re: Back to arrays... =(

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: A89: Re: Back to arrays... =(
• From: "Kaus" <kaus@cybrzn.com>
• Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 23:54:14 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <002d01bed8b4$a4b08fa0$b10c7ed1@eddie>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

well, basically, you were trying to reference an immediate data to an
immediate address.. cant do.
it tryes to convert atht instruction (i think) to a moveq.l but that doesnt
support immediate addressing.
i dunno
i might not be making any sense whatsoever... :)

kaus

----- Original Message -----
From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 11:46 PM
Subject: A89: Back to arrays... =(


>
> Wow, it's been a long time since I actually posted a letter instead of a
> reply...
>
> Well, I tried a program with :
>
>     ...
>     move.w    #4,2(array)
>     move.w    #4,4(array)
>     lea       array,a6
>     ...
> array
>     ds.b      20
>     ...
>
> and the program won't compile.  So I tried:
>
>     ...
>     lea       array,a6
>     move.w    #4,2(a6)
>     move.w    #4,4(a6)
>     ...
> array
>     ds.b      20
>     ...
>
> and that works.  I just want to know why I have to use a register for it
to
> work.  Thanks.
>
> -Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
>

• A89: Back to arrays... =(
• From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>

• Prev: A89: Back to arrays... =(
• Next: Re: A89: man, this list is becoming just a big joke.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread