A89: Re: Archive memory

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A89: Re: Archive memory
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 16:13:49 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
References: <LOBBIDAKFNHMLPNHPGLOGEDBCAAA.filipepinto@mail.telepac.pt>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


AFAIK, unlike the normal memory, archive memory is read-only.  And you can't
put libraries or external levels in archive memory either.

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: Filipe Soares Pinto <filipepinto@mail.telepac.pt>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 1:13 PM
Subject: A89: Archive memory


>
> I understand that this isn't 'assembly', but i just bought my ti-89
> yesterday, and (having i had a ti-86) it is very different from my old
one.
> I don't understand if there are any disadvantages in using the archive
> memory, instead of the archive memory. The archive memory, i have already
> realised, causes a lot of trashing, i think, but other than that (which i
> haven't understood very well also) it seems pretty much the same.
> NEvertheless, the author of street fighter says in the txt file, that he
> advises that the program should be in the ram memory in order to save
> batteries. Can someone help me with this?
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> P.s. I'm just a newbie with the ti-89
>
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Re: Archive memory

From: "Brad O'Dell" <brodell@gte.net>

References:

A89: Archive memory

From: "Filipe Soares Pinto" <filipepinto@mail.telepac.pt>