Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake
From: "Lynn McCartney" <littlbit@txcyber.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 17:30:21 -0700
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Which version of vti does v1.05 upgrade not work on?
-----Original Message-----
From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, July 26, 1999 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake


>
>Apperently the .tib upgrade file and the .rom whole ROM files are
different,
>as the .tib file no longer works in later versions of VTI.  If they were
>exactly the same, either one should work, right?
>
>I know that the upgrade just overwrites all of the ROM and therefore _is_
>the rom, but they are still obviously different if VTI cannot recognise the
>upgrade file...
>
>-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
>ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
>http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
>To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 4:41 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake
>
>
>> the "upgrade" is equal to the whole rom..
>> Maybe you should try read through all your mail before you start
>responding..
>> I think we now are quite clear on what TI thinks of rom distribution if
>you read
>> the response from Ti posted here..
>>
>> both 1.00 and 1.05 can be found on my computer, as said in an earlier
>letter.
>> I'm not shure if they like me to have 1.05, but if they don't, they can
>send me
>> a letter and I will remove it pronto..
>>
>> file://Olle
>
>
>