Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake
Well, I was under the impression that the .tib file was an encoded version
of the ROM. Perhaps TI changed the encoding scheme..
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake
>
> Apperently the .tib upgrade file and the .rom whole ROM files are
different,
> as the .tib file no longer works in later versions of VTI. If they were
> exactly the same, either one should work, right?
>
> I know that the upgrade just overwrites all of the ROM and therefore _is_
> the rom, but they are still obviously different if VTI cannot recognise
the
> upgrade file...
>
> -Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 4:41 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: BIG mistake
>
>
> > the "upgrade" is equal to the whole rom..
> > Maybe you should try read through all your mail before you start
> responding..
> > I think we now are quite clear on what TI thinks of rom distribution if
> you read
> > the response from Ti posted here..
> >
> > both 1.00 and 1.05 can be found on my computer, as said in an earlier
> letter.
> > I'm not shure if they like me to have 1.05, but if they don't, they can
> send me
> > a letter and I will remove it pronto..
> >
> > file://Olle
>
>
>
References: