Re: A89: Re: arrays...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: arrays...
yes, dc.x does that.. but we are discussing ds.x :)
//Olle
Miles Raymond wrote:
>
> You allocate the space with the dc.x op code. The number after it is just
> what is stored in that space.
>
> So in effect, both are lists of one byte, but they are different in that:
> (displayed in TI-BASIC for simplicity)
>
> array1 = {1}
> array2 = {0}
>
> -Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <S43R80@aol.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 11:30 AM
> Subject: A89: arrays...
>
> > This is probably a dumb question, however, I am curious about defining
> > arrays...I mean if you do something like:
> > array1 ds.b 1
> > then it will allocate (is this the right word?) 1 byte of space at
> location
> > (array1)...
> >
> > but how come if you do:
> > array2 ds.b 0
> > it will still allocate 1 bytes...doesn't it literally mean "define 0 bytes
> of
> > space"?...how come this works then...or am i just interpreting it
> wrongly???
> >
> > -Steve
References: