Re: A89: doors vs plushell

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: doors vs plushell
From: Daniel7073@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 20:44:58 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


He said Proshell, not Plusshell.  You probably already know this, but Proshell
is just another browser.  It does not come with a kernel.

Daniel Imfeld


In a message dated 01/06/1999 5:00:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
ZeromusMog@aol.com writes:

> In a message dated 1/6/99 4:10:45 PM Pacific Standard Time, Quija13@aol.com
>  writes:
>  
>  > > which one is better, also how do u get to doors os not door gui
>  >  
>  >  i think doors is better than plushell for the kernel but proshell kicks 
> ass
>  >  for browsing and running programs
>  
>  Really? Most people (including me) seem to think the other way... the Doors
> OS
>  GUI is highly developed, and has all kinds of features. Plusshell's GUI is
>  like zshell, only it looks bad because zshell was made for a screen a
little
>  less than half the size. :) I think that plusshell has the better kernel,
>  however that could change, if it hasn't already. Xavier works on DoorsOS a
>  LOT, and responds to many bug reports. I use doors to run stuff, but I use
>  Plusshell's development tools. They're more powerful and easier to use.
>  Anything compiled using Plusshell works on DoorsOS.

Prev: Re: A89: Error: 16-bit relocations are unsupported(2nd postion)
Next: A89: to: ccia (sprite editor)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread