Re: A89: Re: Thanks! (1 question)

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Thanks! (1 question)
From: oh@hem.passagen.se
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 02:43:02 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <001201be35d6$92398830$bace5c18@matt.tampabay.rr.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

At 17:32 1999-01-01 -0500, you wrote:
>
>19x19 BYTES???
>
>That is a 152x152 size picture, and way beyond the screen limits
>of the TI-89. Come on guys, use common sense. Also, if you meant
>19x19 pixels, that is incredible "unsmart". You always want
>sprites to be divisible by 8, that is, an 8x8 sprite, or a 16x16 sprite,
>or a 16x8 sprite, etc.

No.. It would be a 152x19 size picture.
19x19 pixels is very unsmart, yes..  but it only matters to have it
dividable by 8 in X..  in Y it doesn't matter. so.. 8x7 or 16x23 or 8x8 is
equally "smart"

//Olle
sorry for going on details :)

References:

A89: Re: Thanks! (1 question)

From: "Matt Johnson" <matt2000@dogtech.com>

Prev: A89: Another Evidence of the Symbolic Struggle between Man and Grayscale
Next: Re: A89: Re: Thanks! (1 question)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread