Re: A89: Looking to Weave BASIC and ASM

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Looking to Weave BASIC and ASM
From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:01:27 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
References: <v04011700b2ff2c294c37@[146.151.40.69]>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


If it is only small routines you can compile them by hand.. 
or you can compile it with a68k and read the S-record (it can output Srecord
right? not shure now..) output and put that in your exec string (needs a
computer though)

//Olle

Nate Mueller wrote:
> 
> >        Hi,
> >          I am a newbie at ASM but I have a knack for programming.. I am dog
> >tired of torturing BASIC (I write alot of progs at school in my spare time)
> >to make it do what I want. Bottom line is that even though 89 BASIC is much
> >more powerful than 83 for example, it is realy just a smattering of math
> >functions. I would love to take the ease of use of BASIC (and the fact that
> >I can edit it directly on the calc) and somehow weave ASM functionality with
> >it. Create a hybrid. Perhaps the 'Exec' function could provide a way in the
> >door. Can anybody give me some suggestions.
> >
> >        -Miles <milez@mindspring.com>
> 
> What may help (and may not) would be an on-calc assembler.   Take a string
> as input and output a string that could be run with the exec function.
> Don't think it will happen any time soon though
> 
>         --Nate

References:

Re: A89: Looking to Weave BASIC and ASM

From: Nate Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>

Prev: Re: A89: Looking to Weave BASIC and ASM
Next: A89: Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:51:17 -0600
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread