A89: Re: Re: TI Calc Video
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A89: Re: Re: TI Calc Video
you couldn't really just switch the screen to display a different frame
unless you made sure that the entire video occured at a mod 8 = 0 memory
address .. maybe by copying the entire video file from archive to RAM before
playing.
The double buffering idea might work for decompression; I'm almost certain
that if it was programmed properly enough it could be decompressed in well
less than 1/350 of a second.
>If this leaves enough processing power for the CPU to handle decompression,
>then the interupt could be changed so that it just switches between two
>locations in memory, and while one is being displayed, the CPU would
>decompress the next frame and store it in the location not currently being
>displayed by the interrupt. I really don't think that this is possible,
>because of the limited processing power, but I'm not really one to say.
Dux
>or Olle could probably answer this question.
>
>-Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
>ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: MRayMan
>http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: SirKnight <sirknight@mindless.com>
>To: TI-89 ASM Dev <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 10:55 PM
>Subject: A89: TI Calc Video
>
>
>>Anyone know how big video would be, and if it's possible? You wouldn't
>have
>>to program extra for grayscale, you could do that with the different
frames
>>of the video. Anyone know how fast you can load an entire graphics
screen,
>>and if the calc is fast enough to do any compression with video? I want
>>just thinking that It'd be great for RPG games to have cutscreens, or
>battle
>>animations. (But then again, is there enough memory to make it worth it?
>>Perhaps having the cutscenes in a different file and making them optional
>>would be the best way for players low on calc memory)
>>
>>-SirKnight
>
>
>