Re: A89: Re: Attn: "TI-BOMBERMAN"

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Re: Attn: "TI-BOMBERMAN"


im just wondering, what are you all talking about? i never received the original
"mail bomb" (if there was one) did Bryan delete it or something?

Grant Stockly wrote:

> >This is interesting.  Personally, I would have to agree with pretty much
> >everything Adam Davis said.  (See:  REPLY, at bottom of message)  If anyone
> >is intersted in finding out who it is,  Yahoo probably has that information,
> >but being confidential, they shouldn't give it out.
>
> If you find out, I can get his internet account suspended.
>
> >I also have a question.  Adam, when you mentioned the HELO protocol, were
> >you referring to the Sendmail commands in which the first command is HELO
> >with some parameters?
> >
> >Daniel Imfeld
>
> He did it to me.  He makes it seem like he is the ultimate "inteligent" (he
> spelled intelligent wrong) when true intelligent people don't do immature
> and childish things.
>
> >The message sent to me (contained conveniently in the 1304 copies sent)
> >is as follows(Some headers deleted):
>
> He only got 10 to go to me since my SMTP server won't receive more than 10
> of the same message.
>
> If you want, I can give you a foward address so that those rules will apply
> for you too.  Did you get subscribed to a bunch of mailing lists too?  I
> just did a mass reply and immediately was taken off all of them
>
> he really wasted his time.
>
> >I ever encountered on the internet.  This guy did
> >happen to be on Mirc.
>
> Wow.  Computer science majors should know the difference between mirc the
> client and IRC the protocol.  :\  How can you be on a client?
>
> He sent the exact same message to me also...
>
> He said he used to be on the 83 list, and them moved onto the 89 list.
>
> >REPLY:
> >I appreciate your desire to enlighten me as to your alleged intelligence
> >and motives.   My earlier message was meant mainly in fun, and I did not
> >mean to insult your intelligence, although it looks like you took it
> >personally.
> >Perhaps you have more knowledge in a given area than I do, but I
> >gurantee I'll have more knowledge in another area.  Intelligence, to me,
> >is the wise use and application of knowledge.  You have demonstrated
> >your knowledge, but very unwisely.  Thus, you expose your level of
> >intelligence.
>
> I SERIOUSLY doubt that.  :)  I'm sure he has a few screws loose, you on the
> other hand are the intelligent one.
References: