Re: A89: GIDE and Gooey crap To Scott:
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: GIDE and Gooey crap To Scott:
Unless you are correct, this is possibly the worst possible thing to say to
ANY PROGRAMMER. If what you said was a false accusation I consider you lower
than any blasted TI-83+ whiner, this would put you below any person I have
ever seen who could have cut down a programmer.
Even if this is a fake, do not take it upon yourself to give judgement upon a
programmer. It is not your place to do so. Heck, personally I think that
you haven't contributed that much to the TI cause at all. I'm not saying
this because I have, but you don't seem to be trying to attack this problem,
and if you aren't, then don't sit on your ass and whine about other people's
attempts
-Trailblazer
In a message dated 12/30/1999 1:33:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
wrath@calc.org writes:
<< And now after some discussion with a fellow TCPA member (Wing), I have
some more to add to this thread. Did anyone ever look at GIDE's
screenshots. There a handful of tell-tale sign that make it look fake...
and I apologize if it isn't. First of... That looks awfully like a
all-purpose editor. It contains nothing specific... It looks like a HTML
editor, and some of the things, like the send, and update, and print
button makes sense to be in a HTML, oh the view thing in the menu. The
debug thing looks like VTI's and the simulator window looks pasted in...
(Look at the window border). And it was a horrible job at that. The T
hangs over... and therre is a blue strip from a crappy paste job. Umm...
the mnemonics are keywords... look above you see batch keywords, blue
keywords... and what is a syntax scheme in asm? For anyone who wants to
see some of things I found odd... go here to see my edited screenshot:
http://www.krib.com/scott/gidehoax.jpg. THIS IS A HOAX!!! a clever hoax
yes, but not a perfect one. Everyone wanted it so bad that when someone
said they could do it, you all blindly fell into it.
"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." -- Lazarus Long >>
Follow-Ups: