Re: A89: gettin' started
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: gettin' started
no. it is just that if you do make shell independant programs, you cant use
anything from normal doorsos libs, or the huge amount of features in the os
itself.
--kaus
----- Original Message -----
From: Cassady Roop <croop@oregontrail.net>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: A89: gettin' started
>
> so it is impossible to make shell independent programs? Or rather,
> impossible to make programs that require nothing but themselves on the
> calc? On the 86 you can because there is a ROM call table in the ROM
> that is gauranteed not to change between different ROM versions. Does
> the 89 not have one?
>
> What exactly does the assembler replace a library reference with at
> compile time?
>
> Cassady Roop
>
> KeysDezes@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > When you assemble, you need to have the appropriate header file in the
> > correct directory (ie. graphlib.h) and you need to include it in the
asm
> > file (ie. include "graphlib.h"). And yes, to run the prgm, the library
(ie.
> > graphlib.89z) needs to be on the calculator.
> >
> > In a message dated 12/29/99 7:52:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > JHill8075@aol.com writes:
> >
> > > the library has to be on the calc. when u assemble it, the call to the
> > > library is replaced with something else (i'm new to asm too, but i
can
> > make
> > > simple things, like maying smile faces moving around). it's hard to
> > explain,
> > >
> > > but that tutorial grant (keys dezes) pointed you to will tell you
> > everything
> > >
> > > you need to know.
> > >
> > > Josh
> > >
> > > << so does the library have to be on the calculator for the program
to
> > > run? If so, then how is it so simple to reference a library call if
the
> > > library is a variable separate from the program? >>
> >
> > Grant Elliott
> > <A
> > HREF="http://www.crosswinds.net/~proganon">Programmers Anonymous</A>
>
References: