Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:04:02 -0500
References: <0.b28cd54b.2589cc22@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Ok, now I'm having trouble figuring out which e-mail you are replying to
here... what did I say that was pessimistic?

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?


>
> Dang, Bryan really is the pessimistic "I'm Right, You're Wrong" kinda
guy:P
> If you worked at TI, you'd be the one who said, "HAHAHAHA!!!  stupid loser
> programmers, destroy their games, make mac-like TI's!!!"  I'll bet you use
a
> Mac and eat spam too eh.  What next, saying you're anti-everything?
>
> *sighs in relief* Ahh, my anger has been threaded upon the pathetic web of
> your soul.
>
> -Trailblazer
>
>

References:

Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

From: Cyong0@aol.com

Prev: A89: Re: WARNING TO USERS OF AMS 2.03
Next: A89: Re: look at this crap from TI
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread