Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
You and me can go on all day about this. Your stong in religous beliefs I'm
strong in science beliefs. If you want to continue >> Serial@earthlink.net
----- Original Message -----
From: <TurboSoft@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 1999 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
>
> In a message dated 12/12/99 2:33:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> davediego@geocities.com writes:
>
> > that one specimen doesnt grow the eye, its offspring many genrations
down
> > will
> > finally grow the eye. it keeps progressing from 1 light sensitive cell,
to
> > the
> > whole eye, with millions of that species of animal living and dying
before
> > the
> > eye is finally acheived
>
> if that were true, why don't we have other eyes for other light? What
could
> possibly cause the "light sensitive" cell to start anyway, with the
intense
> complexity of the eye? there is a _huge_ number of factors that would
happen
> at the same time for evolution to take place, it's hard to even get two or
> three to happen at the same time.
>
> --TurboSoft
>
> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE: The most current Basic and C programs
created
> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> <A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
>
>
References: