Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 16:46:13 -0800
References: <00e301bf444a$92f10180$74938ccd@littlbit>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

well. Based on the first paintings at lascox painted by early nomadic
peoples which are the first ones showing actual intelligence in the form of
art and independent thinking, They drew food in the caves. and horses and
bulls. Their skelletons are pretty damn similar to ours today. There pretty
close maybe they can be called the real cave men. =] They carbon dated the
skelletons to 35 thousand years old.

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Greening <littlbit@txcyber.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin


>
> based on evolution
>
> Eric Greening
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serial <Serial@earthlink.net>
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Saturday, December 11, 1999 2:37 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
>
>
> >
> >humans are a little over 35 thousand years old.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Eric Greening <littlbit@txcyber.com>
> >To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 4:18 PM
> >Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Evolution supports that the world is over billions of years old but,
what
> >if
> >> it were only say 5000 years old?  Then there is no way evolution could
> >have
> >> happened in that short amount of time.  Now, I'm going to completely
drop
> >> this subject, seeing that this is an assembly-89 list. Not a religion
> >list.
> >> Sorry for the off-topic posts.
> >>
> >> Eric Greening
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Martin <davediego@geocities.com>
> >> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >> Date: Saturday, December 11, 1999 1:41 PM
> >> Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >turbosoft, i remember u asking what "caused" something to grow an eye,
> >well
> >> if
> >> >the little microorganism kept swimmnig into the superheated water
cause
> >it
> >> >couldnt tell wtf it was doing or going, dont u think that something
that
> >> could
> >> >even remotely tell what it was doing would live longer? i sure as hell
> >do,
> >> and
> >> >all these little advancements built up over BILLIONS of years, ur
> >> forgetting
> >> >just how long the earth has been around, thats how evolution is sound
> >> >
> >> >TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In a message dated 12/10/99 10:56:53 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> >> >> AzNgUy66@aol.com writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > and i was just wondering.....
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  when has evolution been disproven?
> >> >>
> >> >> what l mean is how the parts of "evidence" "supporting" evolution
has
> >> been
> >> >> disproven.  Neither creation or evolution fit into the scientific
> >method,
> >> >> anyway.  But even still, you must look at evidence supporting either
> >one.
> >> >> Neanderthal man, Giraffes stretching their necks, etc. are still
> taught
> >> as
> >> >> fact in some textbooks, and even a few random museums probably.  As
> >many
> >> >> things, such as ape-man skulls and stuff are disproven (ususally
turn
> >out
> >> to
> >> >> be an ape jaw attached to a human skull or whatever), there is an
> >> increasing
> >> >> amount of evidence for creation coming out in more recent years.
> >> >>
> >> >> --TurboSoft
> >> >>
> >> >> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE:  The most current Basic and C programs
> >> created
> >> >> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> >> >> <A
> HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
References:
Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
From: "Eric Greening" <littlbit@txcyber.com>