Re: A89: Alignment Error
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Alignment Error
They do indeed. The neandrathols would be our closest evolutionary links I
would assume. They were roughly 7 feet tall and had hair around everywhere
but their hands feet and faces. They hunted and gathered much the way early
settlers did. And their bone structure suggest they were a lot stronger than
the average man.
----- Original Message -----
From: <TurboSoft@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Alignment Error
>
> In a message dated 12/11/99 5:39:42 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> Serial@earthlink.net writes:
>
> > missing link to what?
>
> what evolutionists would call an animal relating a human to an ape, or
etc.
> we've got plenty of fossils of ape and a lot of human fossils, but don't
> really have any fossils of an ape-man that weren't either hoaxes or [have
> been/are] being disproven. A principle of evolution is slow change, where
is
> the evidence of slow change (or any!) between men and
apes/monkeys/whatever
> ?! :)
>
> --TurboSoft
>
> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE: The most current Basic and C programs
created
> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> <A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: