Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 14:41:55 -0800
References: <0.ac18994d.25842b51@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


ouch.... short time? it's been around 4+ billion years. In that time A 6
million foot rock could be worn down to the size of a golf ball by air
erosion. There is no limit to the test of time.

----- Original Message -----
From: <TurboSoft@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin


>
> In a message dated 12/11/99 4:41:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> davediego@geocities.com writes:
>
> > turbosoft, i remember u asking what "caused" something to grow an eye,
well
> > if
> >  the little microorganism kept swimmnig into the superheated water cause
it
> >  couldnt tell wtf it was doing or going, dont u think that something
that
> > could
> >  even remotely tell what it was doing would live longer?
>
> so, assuming that this "something" lived a life more or less near the same
> span as animals today, could it grow an eye in its lifetime?  Also,
according
> to what you say its lifespan would be even shorter...
>
> >  i sure as hell do,
> > and
> >  all these little advancements built up over BILLIONS of years, ur
> forgetting
> >  just how long the earth has been around, thats how evolution is sound
>
> are we also forgetting the mass of evidence that points to how _short_ the
> earth has been around?
>
> --TurboSoft
>
> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE:  The most current Basic and C programs
created
> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> <A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
>
>

References:

Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin

From: TurboSoft@aol.com