Re: A89: This damn sdk thing.

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: This damn sdk thing.
From: Mark Zavislak <felix@megsinet.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 15:48:41 -0600
In-reply-to: <384BD778.4981845E@sover.net>
References: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9912061005470.6167-100000@sitriini.hut.fi>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>If all of you are so pissed about this whole damn sdk not allowing over
>8k or not being signed or whatever the hell else, then don't use their
>god damned SDK. They made it, they didn't have to do it, so they are
>going to want to be paid for it. They did it for us, it should be good
>enough that they are releasing a free version at all.

The problem seems to be that the ROM itself enforces the 8kb limit, not
just the SDK.  Here's a quote from a previous post:

---
"I did test.I made program long 8189 bytes and 8197 bytes. The first one
worked, the second one showed
Error: Argument must be expression
---

THAT is the problem, not the SDK.

-Mark
felix@megsinet.net

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: This damn sdk thing.

From: "Kaus" <kaus@cybrzn.com>

References:

Re: A89: The logic behing signined and unsigned programs!

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Risto_J=E4rvinen?= <rjarvine@cc.hut.fi>

A89: This damn sdk thing.

From: Jarrod <xero@sover.net>