Re: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM
From: Adam Davis <adavis@baladyne.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 16:30:53 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
References: <000801bee36c$c6139da0$d71e0318@cc480554-c.catv1.md.home.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

}InFuZeD{ wrote:
> b.t.w. a 400mhz x86 computer would most likely run more then 40x the speed
> of the 89. This is because desktop "computers" have more RAM, higher bus
> speeds, and better instruction sets. I'm not saying that a 400mhz 68k
> processor wouldn't run 40x as fast but you catch my drift.

You're right, there are a lot of improvements which make the new processors
effectively faster than the 68k.  Didn't think about it at the time...

-Adam

References:

Re: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM

From: "}InFuZeD{" <zoneti@home.com>

Prev: Re: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM
Next: Re: A89: No Subject
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread