Re: A89: Uh-Oh. . .

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Uh-Oh. . .
From: Ben Rodgers <bentensai@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 15:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


I have tried to use it and when I try to compile I get
runtime error '5' or it shows msdos but it doesn't
compile.

--- Scott Noveck <noveck@pluto.njcc.com> wrote:
> 
> Apparently any file compiled with ASM Studio 89/92+
> causes a transmission
> error when being sent to VTI68k and will not be
> received -- haven't tried it
> with a REAL 89, but I'm assuming that the results
> are the same.  I'm looking
> into it, but it seems that any file that I compile
> by having ASM Studio
> 89/92+ run A68k has the same problem - I've tried
> calling the Plusshell A68k
> file with the same parameters I normally would and
> still no luck.  I'm
> baffled. . . right now, I'm using "Shell (Filename)"
> to compile it, is there
> a better way to do this in Visual Basic?
> 
>                 -Scott Noveck (SMN)
>                  smn@calc.org
>                  Lead Programmer:
>                  Pokemon 89 - Zelda 89
>                  http://ccia.calc.org
> 
> 
> 

===
Visit my website, Some Assembly Required, at 
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/gilford/908 


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Prev: A89: get a number
Next: Re: A89: get a number
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread