Re: A89: Shell compatibility

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Shell compatibility
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 04:29:56 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <34e11a8.360da134@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Well, if you want to only run Doors programs, then installing Doors OS
wouldn't be inefficient.  But if you wanted to run PlusShell programs as
well (basically the same thing as regular 89-asm), then it would be
inefficient.  You can run PlusShell programs without installing any
"shell".  All you need is the libraries.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, Newsletter, and HTML
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Sat, 26 Sep 1998 TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:

> 
> In a message dated 9/26/98 2:17:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> brabeler@ticalc.org writes:
> 
> > That is still inefficient if you want to run PlusShell programs on your
> >  calc while Doors is installed.  So that is why we need one shell that
> >  everyone can agree on.
> 
> it sounds as though with the Doors program installed that the regular (and
> plusshell programs) would be inefficient.
>

References:

Re: A89: Shell compatibility

From: TurboSoft@aol.com

Prev: Re: A89: Shell compatibility
Next: Re: A89: Virus Scanner for the 89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread