A89: Re: Drugwars (or actually speed of 89)

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A89: Re: Drugwars (or actually speed of 89)

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A89: Re: Drugwars (or actually speed of 89)
From: Jalmari Raippalinna <jussijr@evitech.fi>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 07:40:09 +0200 (EET)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <19980924165606.441661F4D0@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Funny that everyone keeps telling me that 89 would be slower than
86 because of symbolic calculus and rom being written in c. 
so? what all this has to do with low-level asm coding?


- BioProductioN, BioTech

References:

From: