Re: A89: annoying little quirks

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: annoying little quirks
From: {-kimo-} <kimo@stones.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 13:27:31 +0000
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <199809092151.QAA28666@pan.wt.net>
References: <000a01bddc3a$0c868bc0$5cd51cac@patrick>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

just go to TI's graphing calculator comparison page and compare the 89 to 83. then compare the 89 to the 92+. hmm, which calculator comes closer to the 89's functions? i'm thinking the 92+ by a long shot. . . .

At 04:48 PM 9/9/98, you wrote:
>
>>NO, the TI-89 is based on the TI-83 on most of the BASIC functions and the
>>way the keys are laid out.
>>     Pat
>
>
>NO, they're not. Do you own either calculator? I would wager not, based
>on the fact you know jack crap about the 89. The only similarity is the 5
>keys on the top, and those are mostly function keys any way (f1-f8), which
>just supports my 86 position. And the basic functions are like the 92(+),
>not at all like the 83. Jeez.
>
>Robby Gutmann
>gutmann@planet-connect.com
>ICQ UIN: 724927      Agonostis on IRC
>
>Of course, Ankh-Morpork's citizens had always claimed that the river water
>was incredibly pure. Any water that had passed through so many kidneys,
>they reasoned, had to be very pure indeed.
>       -- (Terry Pratchett, Sourcery)
>

{-kimo-}

Summers never live up to your expectations . . .

-kimo

_____________________________________

References:

Re: A89: annoying little quirks

From: "Pat J" <pat@jalyn.com>

Re: A89: annoying little quirks

From: Robby Gutmann <gutmann@planet-connect.com>