RE: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
Well, if you look at it that way, the TI-83 and TI-86 have shells built in, too, but the large majority of people still use a shell for those calculators...
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Thayne Miller
Sent: Monday, September 07, 1998 4:26 PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
why do you want a new OS for the 89? Isn't it good enough how it is? And
PLUS, who's going to spend so much time making a new OS when ASM support is
already built in? Why do we focus on making some good games/apps for the 89
before we tackle such a big project (which IMO is not worth spending time
on)
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bower <eddie@evansville.net>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>
>No, we're thinking about creating a new Operating System for the 89.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex3917@aol.com <Alex3917@aol.com>
>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 6:03 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>
>
>>
>>ok, i understand, but why does it need to be changed...Is it to run
>>assembly...i thought assembly support was built in...
>>
>