Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...


If everybody said that the OS and programming features of every TI calc we
would all still be playing basic pong.  The only reason why this mailing
list as well as a large number of web pages exist.  The main idea is that we
are trying to exploit these calculators so they can do anything and
everything we wish.


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bower <eddie@evansville.net>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...


>
>I said thinking about it, not planning yet, if we think of enough good
>reasons to have it, and get enough support then we'll do it... Until then,
>who knows?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thayne Miller <yomaster@inconnect.com>
>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 6:22 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>
>
>>
>>why do you want a new OS for the 89?  Isn't it good enough how it is?  And
>>PLUS, who's going to spend so much time making a new OS when ASM support
is
>>already built in?  Why do we focus on making some good games/apps for the
>89
>>before we tackle such a big project (which IMO is not worth spending time
>>on)
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris Bower <eddie@evansville.net>
>>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 5:06 PM
>>Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>>
>>
>>>
>>>No, we're thinking about creating a new Operating System for the 89.
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Alex3917@aol.com <Alex3917@aol.com>
>>>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 6:03 PM
>>>Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>ok, i understand, but why does it need to be changed...Is it to run
>>>>assembly...i thought assembly support was built in...
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>