Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
I said thinking about it, not planning yet, if we think of enough good
reasons to have it, and get enough support then we'll do it... Until then,
who knows?
-----Original Message-----
From: Thayne Miller <yomaster@inconnect.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>
>why do you want a new OS for the 89? Isn't it good enough how it is? And
>PLUS, who's going to spend so much time making a new OS when ASM support is
>already built in? Why do we focus on making some good games/apps for the
89
>before we tackle such a big project (which IMO is not worth spending time
>on)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris Bower <eddie@evansville.net>
>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 5:06 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>
>
>>
>>No, we're thinking about creating a new Operating System for the 89.
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alex3917@aol.com <Alex3917@aol.com>
>>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 6:03 PM
>>Subject: Re: A89: Re: Make love, not shell wars...
>>
>>
>>>
>>>ok, i understand, but why does it need to be changed...Is it to run
>>>assembly...i thought assembly support was built in...
>>>
>>
>
>