Re: A89: Re: Re: TI-89 ROM

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: TI-89 ROM
From: David Phillips <electrum@tfs.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 14:59:08 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <000f01bdd8e0$ee4f72e0$311878cc@trigger>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

That should be the rom.  The problem with dissassembling the rom is that it
was written in C.  On any other TI-8x calculator, the rom code might
actually make sense, because it was written by a human.

Did TI included a rom call table with the 92+ module?  If so, I'd bet that
most of the calls are the same.  That would seem to be the place to start.

At 10:22 AM 9/5/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>hehe, you do mean a 13.1mb file named output.asm which seems to be the
>rom... I can't get any kind of text editor to open it w/o slowing my system
>to a crawl...
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Klaus <lukas1@xpoint.at>
>To: Assembly 89 <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Saturday, September 05, 1998 7:36 AM
>Subject: A89: Re: TI-89 ROM
>
>
>>
>>disasm.exe 980521ac.92p
>>Now you have a file named output.asm which seems to be the rom(I believe)
>>Good Luck!

--
David Phillips
mailto:electrum@tfs.net
ICQ: 13811951
AOL/AIM: Electrum32

Follow-Ups:

A89: Was specific 68K processor does the TI-89 have?

From: Cassano <nathan@ipeg.com>

References:

A89: Re: Re: TI-89 ROM

From: "Chris Bower" <eddie@evansville.net>

Prev: A89: errornum's generated by Exec command
Next: A89: Was specific 68K processor does the TI-89 have?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread