Re: A89: 89 Archive Memory

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: 89 Archive Memory
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 00:18:31 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <19980901221527.18146.qmail@www05.netaddress.usa.net>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


The TI-92 Plus has the same amount of memory as the TI-89.  And the 92+
does have an archive, but the 92 doesn't.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Tue, 1 Sep 1998 granatir@usa.net wrote:

> 
> I got my 89 yesterday from Bhards in Chicago, and it's great...
> But why did TI have the 300K or so of Archive memory instead of just 500K or 600K of RAM? Does the 92/92+ have an Archive, too?
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>

References:

A89: 89 Archive Memory

From: granatir@usa.net

Prev: Re: A89: anyone else had this problem?
Next: Re: Re: A89: File Archive
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread