Re: A89: anyone else had this problem?

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: anyone else had this problem?
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 00:06:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <5b402a2.35ec0e8b@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Well, right, but I bet that assembly programs aren't compatible between
them though.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Tue, 1 Sep 1998 ComAsYuAre@aol.com wrote:

> 
> 
> In a message dated 9/1/98 5:05:30, brabeler@ticalc.org writes:
> 
> >
> >Are you sure the manual says that both BASIC and Assembly 92+ stuff will
> >work on the 89?
> 
> 
> from what i've read, the 92+ and 89 basically have identical roms, the only
> differences being geometry, screen size, and key input.
>

References:

Re: A89: anyone else had this problem?

From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com

Prev: Re: A89: anyone else had this problem?
Next: A89: 89 Archive Memory
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread