Re: A89: TI89
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: TI89
At 08:56 PM 10/30/98, S43R80@aol.com said:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Beginning of Original Message~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>Well, My 85 was recently stolen..The thing that really bothered me
was that I
>just started my first game (which would have been worthy of
releasing), that
>would have been finished in around 1 month...I had no intention of
buying the
>89 because I already had a calculator that worked fine but I guess
now I have
>a reason...I would like to know what you all think of the calc...Do
any of you
the calc is great! if you ever plan on advancing further than
calculus then it's a good little tool to have. it's especially
helpful when checking problems or tests! =)
>regret buying it, and is programming in 68K any/much more difficult
than
>programming for the z80?...also are assembly games written in 68K any
"better"
i don't know if they're any better. i've played asm games on the 86
and 85 and compared to the ones i've played on the 89, i don't see much
of a difference. although with the 89's 384k of user-available
memory, i think games for the 89 will be much more detailed. which
could cause a "better" game.
>than say with the z80 or is the only difference the size of the
game?...I went
>to staples today and they didn't have the calc, so where can I buy
it? Where
>would the definately have it in stock?
i got mine at
http://www.calculatorsinc.com
for $137 (includes shipping)
and the other day i was at an office max and saw them there for
150.
>
> -thanks-
>
>Steven
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~End of Original Message~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{-keYmo-}
References: