Re: A89: TI <--?--> I2C

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: TI <--?--> I2C
From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 00:28:20 +0200
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <001701bdf943$63724480$5f5efea9@eddie>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Why not use a simpler and more specialized protocoll invented by yourself?
Or why not use the builtin protocol for linking?
It's not really worth it to implement I2C or MBus just for making 2 calcs
communicate with eachother...

//Olle

> Miles Raymond wrote:
> 
> Let's just say that I wanted to make a two-player game.  If I programmed it to
> use the I2C and MBus protocols, then could two people with just a TI-link be
> able to play the game?
> 
> According to my understanding, I2C and MBus are protocols, so in order for the
> game to be played, a MBus hub is not necessary.  Is this true?
> 
> -Miles Raymond

References:

A89: TI <--?--> I2C

From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>

Prev: A89: TI <--?--> I2C
Next: A89: 89 keyboard
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread