Re: A89: Re: Pokemon

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Pokemon
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 16:08:19 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Nah, you are right.  But I wasn't refering to them as hicks because they
didn't have a TV.  I was refering to them as hicks because they were from
Texas.

I don't watch too much TV either.  It just happens that I have a N64, and I
visit http://www.ign64.com/ every now and then to pick up some info.  And
that's where I learned about it.  I also saw it in the KMart add, and on TV
the day after.

-Miles Raymond

-----Original Message-----
From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com <ComAsYuAre@aol.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 25, 1998 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Pokemon


>In a message dated 11/25/98 00:11:12 Eastern Standard Time,
>m_rayman@bigfoot.com writes:
>
>> Hick
>>
>>  oops, sorry.  That was the general stereotypical response.  I know that
>>  there is a very good chance that you aren't one.
>>
>>  But really, you should be able to find the cartoon on cable (UPN, I
>>  think...) and all of the toys at KMart or Walmart or whatever...  And
then
>>  if you still have no clue, go to http://www.nintendo.com/ and click on
the
>>  little Pokemon or just go to http://www.pokemon.com/ to find out more
about
>>  Pokemon.
>>
>>  -Miles Raymond
>
>i live 5 minutes out of dc, and had never heard of pokemon before the topic
>arose on this list.  just because everyone isn't glued to a television
doesn't
>mean they're hicks.