Re: A89: Re: Maybe some math programs?

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Maybe some math programs?
From: "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 01:40:10 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org



Machine code is essentially all that's run by the calc, if that's what you
mean.  But there're no conversions into machine code when you run a basic
program.


>
>Kick me if I'm wrong, but I thought the basic program was like a script.
The
>interpreter runs through the script and makes the appropriate rom calls
during
>the script.  But in essence, what do the rom calls translate into?  In one
>form or another, it all has to boil down to being converted into machine
code,
>right?
>
>In a message dated 11/23/98 8:49:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,
EaglePrj@aol.com
>writes:
>
><< the calc doesnt exactly compile the basic programs to machine code. >>

Prev: Re: A89: Re: Maybe some math programs?
Next: Re: A89: Re: Maybe some math programs?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread