Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
From: "=?iso-8859-1?B?VGltIEL2c2NrZQ==?=" <boescke@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 15:16:16 -0000
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org



It is true. The M68000 is internally 32 bit and externally 16 bit.
Its the most powerful commercial CPU from the seventies, also
vastly superior to the 8086. Also Intel knew that - thats why 
they started operation Crush.. etc etc.. 


>
>Is that true?  I thought the M68k was 8-bit like the Z80.
>
>-Miles Raymond
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dennis Ng <onpaws@geocities.com>
>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, November 22, 1998 1:44 PM
>Subject: RE: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
>
>
>>It's 32=bit!
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>>> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Nathan Mueller
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:18 AM
>>> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>>> Subject: Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
>>> 
>>> >And about making a 64-bit game on a 8(I think)-bit system
>>> 
>>> Is the 68k 8-bit?  I thought it was 16
>>> 
>>> --Nate
>

Prev: Re: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)
Next: Re: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread