Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:32:37 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Is that true?  I thought the M68k was 8-bit like the Z80.

-Miles Raymond

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Ng <onpaws@geocities.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, November 22, 1998 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply


>It's 32=bit!
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Nathan Mueller
>> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:18 AM
>> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>> Subject: Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
>> 
>> >And about making a 64-bit game on a 8(I think)-bit system
>> 
>> Is the 68k 8-bit?  I thought it was 16
>> 
>> --Nate

Follow-Ups:

A89: number of bits in the 68k :)

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

RE: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply

From: "Dennis Ng" <onpaws@geocities.com>

Prev: Re: A89: StarFox89
Next: Re: A89: StarFox89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread