Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
From: "Ahmed El-Helw" <ahmed@ticalc.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:27:05 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


all we need is a UI for it :) My friends can't figure out how to do
program().
-Ahmed

-----Original Message-----
From: Xavier VASSOR - The Doors Team <doors@altern.org>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, November 22, 1998 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?


>
>>I realize this question has probably been answered several times:  Which
>>one should I use?
>>
>>The way I understand it, they both operate the same way now.  So which one
>>is going to be the standard?
>Personnaly I think they are both standards because they are compatible now.
>The advantage of DoorsOS is the AntiCrash protection which recovers most
>crashes.
>
>
>Xavier VASSOR
>---The Doors Team
>E-mail:xvassor@mail.dotcom.fr
>Doors Homepage: http://www.altern.org/doors
>ICQ:10241721
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?

From: Xavier VASSOR - The Doors Team <doors@altern.org>

Prev: RE: A89: Mario news
Next: Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread