Re: A89: Re: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
From: Charles Vaughn <cyberdeity@pdq.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 10:28:16 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <v04011700b274342f9b3f@[146.151.40.69]>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

I can understand that the user needs simplicity, however, making one giant
library would cause far more problems than it would solve.  Because from time
to time developers would want to update libraries and having one big one would
present problems.  The TI community would be swamped with many diffrent
incompatible large libraries.  But with the smaller libraries upgrading is far
more easier.

Nathan Mueller wrote:

>
>
> I think from the point of view of the user, it would be best to simply
> combine these three libraries into one.  Since the're pretty standard stuff
> it wouldn't be a problem.  You must remember that the people using these
> programs aren't as calculator savy as you are.  I think that we could make
> the small developer-end sacrafice to make it easier for the user.
>
>         --Nate

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

From: Nathan Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>

References:

Re: A89: Re: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

From: Nathan Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>