Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
• From: Xavier VASSOR - The Doors Team <doors@altern.org>
• Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 18:22:23 +0100
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <4.1.19981111231647.00b08c30@mail.acc.umu.se>
• References: <005801be0db6$5a4f2da0$ee702299@rwagner>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

>Conclusion: programs could be release in two version; one which requires
>a shell & libraries, and the other have the function used statically
>included. When compiling, a switch could decide which of the version
>is to be compiled.

This is exactly what i think, and i will try to implement it.


Xavier VASSOR
---The Doors Team
E-mail:xvassor@mail.dotcom.fr
Doors Homepage: http://doorshome.home.ml.org
ICQ:10241721

• A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
• From: "Rusty Wagner" <river@gte.net>
• Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
• From: Jimmy =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rdell?= <yarin@acc.umu.se>

• Prev: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
• Next: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread