Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:20:07 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Bryan Cook <MBCook@MBCook.com>
To: 'assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org' <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 6:20 PM
Subject: RE: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell


*CLIP*
>I think that it's defiantly worth it but I think that the two shells
>should be called the same thing (maybe OS plus) and have the shell and
>crash protection plugins

OS+ sounds like a good name to me.  I like this idea, but then there would
be no competition to improve the shell.

-Miles Raymond

>Michael Bryan Cook
*CLIP*

Prev: RE: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
Next: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread