Re: A89: Not Individual

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Not Individual
From: Daniel7073@aol.com
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 19:14:26 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 12/17/1998 1:50:16 PM Pacific Standard Time,
gutmann@planet-connect.com writes:

> I don't think so.  I think that was true for the 8x's (other than the 89),
>  but not for the 89.  Like when that guy emailed the recompiled phoenix to
>  the list, i renamed the file "speedphx.89," and sent it to my calc, and it
>  was "speedphx" on my calc.  I know what you are talking about, on my 85/6,
>  i always had to hex-edit it to change the name, and then recalculate the
>  checksum.  But for some reason, it is different for the 89.

Inside the file, it was probably named speedphx.  Try hex-editing that file,
and you'll see it in there at byte 0x40.  (That's 40 hexadecimal, or 64
decimal).

Daniel Imfeld

Prev: Re: A89: Suggestion: A simple C compiler
Next: Re: A89: Not Individual
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread