Re: A89: Suggestion: A simple C compiler

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Suggestion: A simple C compiler
From: Nate Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 14:34:15 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <00bb01be2ac3$0e0ee8c0$4d1b7ed1@EDDIE>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>Couldn't a library be made to comply with the TI-BASIC form of calling, as
>well as asm calling?
>What I mean is something like:
>filelib(#of_function[,parameters])
>so reading a file could be like:
>filelib(1,name_of_folder,name_of_file)
>and writing could be similar:
>filelib(2,name_of_folder,name_of_file,type_of_file)
>
>In the writing case, the type of file could be one of the TIs specified
>file types, or binary.
>(which would show up as ASM in the VAR-LINK menu)

Yea, I was thinking reading would return a list with each element being a
line in a text file.  Writing would write a string to file, or append a
string to a file.  Something like this would be necessary for an on-calc
compiler/assembler, since I think the best language to write it in would be
BASIC.

	--Nate

References:

Re: A89: Suggestion: A simple C compiler

From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>

Prev: Re: A89: Suggestion: A simple C compiler
Next: Re: A89: How to turn a 3d voxel into a 2d pixel
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread