Re: A89: Zelda 89
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Zelda 89
Oh, I'm sorry... Yeah, I was _REALLY_ trying to hyperextend your point on
the age message with sacrcasm... Give me a break man. Stop trying to pick on
people for something you know nothing about... FYI I'm 17 and freshmen are
the only people I pick on for their age.
-----Original Message-----
From: Serial <Serial@Earthlink.net>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, December 17, 1998 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Zelda 89
>
>Unfortionately I am not going to say it again so read back post and you
will
>find out the millions and billions of things wrong with your post but if
you
>think I am immature then live with it because unless you want to join the
>discussion your opinion means nothing to me.
>
>btw. 'baby', you hyperextended my point from the age message.
>
>Chris Bower wrote:
>
>> You know, bully's usually bully because of an inferiority problem...
What's
>> the matter Serial? Feeling jealous because those mean old people at CCIA
(no
>> offense CCIA) won't let you have a bet copy of Zelda? Aww.... Poor baby.
>> Lose the attitude and stop flaming man. The only thing you are proving is
>> your immaturity.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Serial <Serial@Earthlink.net>
>> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>> Date: Thursday, December 17, 1998 9:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: A89: Zelda 89
>>
>> >
>> >You actually read that? I havn't even read it. Well that's all nice and
>> crap but I pay for my own
>> >ISP. Lets see see what your ISP covers as far as threatening and such
shall
>> we.
>> >
>> >Network unfriendly activity:
>> > Activities which adversely affect the ability of
other
>> people or systems to use
>> >PDQ.net
>> > services or the Internet is prohibited.
>> >*Hmmm...Jackass consitiutes pretty unfriendly activity. Better look out.
>> >
>> >Harassment:
>> > Sending threatening or harassing e-mail after being
>> requested to stop, is
>> >prohibited.
>> > Extremely threatening or harassing e-mail is
prohibited
>> always.
>> >Stop calling me names and violating my harassing me.
>> >
>> >Off-topic or inappropriate postings:
>> > There is no restriction on content, except as defined
by
>> each newsgroup.
>> >Continued
>> > posting of off-topic articles is prohibited. Please
note
>> that commercial
>> >advertisements are
>> > off-topic in the vast majority of newsgroups.
>> >Of course earthlink doesn't have an off-topic rule like your ISP so
watch
>> out.
>> >
>> >I could go of if you want to play *Lawyer debait* but I will likely win
>> since I have done this many
>> >times before and as you can see I am still on the net. Besides this
isn't a
>> newsgroup it is a
>> >*e-mail connection* so dont pretend that you can get earthlink to kick
me
>> off for e-mail cause it
>> >wont happen. Seriously man I dont see why you wanted to get involved in
>> this anyway?
>> >
>> >Charles Vaughn wrote:
>> >
>> >> HEY JACKASS!!!!!!!!!!!
>> >>
>> >> Have you read earthlinks acceptable use policy latley?
>> >>
>> >> 2.10. Disrupting any newsgroup with *frivolous, excessively vulgar*,
or
>> >> *repetitious* postings.
>> >>
>> >> Ohh, I bet your parents will be real happy when you precious little
>> internet connection is taken
>> >> away.
>> >>
>> >> Oh and like you are a great speller as well
>> >>
>> >> for no reaso so you
>> >>
>> >> Serial wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Wow, this person certainly is retarded. Using words like 'problebly'
>> reinforces my suspisions
>> >> > that you dont know what the hell this is all about so who is really
the
>> jackass.
>> >> > Kent brockman reporting: "I say they are both jackasses"
>> >> > I agree Kent.
>> >> >
>> >> > Charles Vaughn wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Wow, this person certainly has the right to call another person
rude.
>> This is possibly one
>> >> > > of the most selfish people I have meat on this list. You need to
>> understand that Zelda 89
>> >> > > is their game. A controled early beta test is very useful for
>> finding bugs. I would be
>> >> > > more than happy to get the game, how ever I will be patient and
wait
>> for the public beta
>> >> > > test. And you probably won't be able to get it from any of the
>> testers. CCIA was probably
>> >> > > smart and didn't give it to jackasses like your self.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Serial wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > oh you must be one of those stupid bastards who banned me from
the
>> #CCIA room on EFnet
>> >> > > > for no reaso so you can just shut the fuck up bastard, I am
talking
>> to humans who arn't
>> >> > > > run by your rude ass totaliaristic bastards society so dont talk
to
>> me about beta
>> >> > > > testers privilages. To all you nice people out there the
queestion
>> rides but send it to
>> >> > > > me privately now so they dont know who did it and I will post
it.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Sorry for the language to all people except the CCIA team.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > David Martin wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > any testers who give away the beta loose their priveleges
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Serial wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > If anyone has zelda 89 can they please post in on this
group.
>> CCIA said there are
>> >> > > > > > 10 beta testers and I assume at least one of them is on this
>> group.
>> >> > > > > > Thanks a bunch,
>> >> > > > > > Serial
>> >
>
Follow-Ups: