Re: A89: Zelda 89
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Zelda 89
You know, bully's usually bully because of an inferiority problem... What's
the matter Serial? Feeling jealous because those mean old people at CCIA (no
offense CCIA) won't let you have a bet copy of Zelda? Aww.... Poor baby.
Lose the attitude and stop flaming man. The only thing you are proving is
your immaturity.
-----Original Message-----
From: Serial <Serial@Earthlink.net>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, December 17, 1998 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Zelda 89
>
>You actually read that? I havn't even read it. Well that's all nice and
crap but I pay for my own
>ISP. Lets see see what your ISP covers as far as threatening and such shall
we.
>
>Network unfriendly activity:
> Activities which adversely affect the ability of other
people or systems to use
>PDQ.net
> services or the Internet is prohibited.
>*Hmmm...Jackass consitiutes pretty unfriendly activity. Better look out.
>
>Harassment:
> Sending threatening or harassing e-mail after being
requested to stop, is
>prohibited.
> Extremely threatening or harassing e-mail is prohibited
always.
>Stop calling me names and violating my harassing me.
>
>Off-topic or inappropriate postings:
> There is no restriction on content, except as defined by
each newsgroup.
>Continued
> posting of off-topic articles is prohibited. Please note
that commercial
>advertisements are
> off-topic in the vast majority of newsgroups.
>Of course earthlink doesn't have an off-topic rule like your ISP so watch
out.
>
>I could go of if you want to play *Lawyer debait* but I will likely win
since I have done this many
>times before and as you can see I am still on the net. Besides this isn't a
newsgroup it is a
>*e-mail connection* so dont pretend that you can get earthlink to kick me
off for e-mail cause it
>wont happen. Seriously man I dont see why you wanted to get involved in
this anyway?
>
>Charles Vaughn wrote:
>
>> HEY JACKASS!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> Have you read earthlinks acceptable use policy latley?
>>
>> 2.10. Disrupting any newsgroup with *frivolous, excessively vulgar*, or
>> *repetitious* postings.
>>
>> Ohh, I bet your parents will be real happy when you precious little
internet connection is taken
>> away.
>>
>> Oh and like you are a great speller as well
>>
>> for no reaso so you
>>
>> Serial wrote:
>>
>> > Wow, this person certainly is retarded. Using words like 'problebly'
reinforces my suspisions
>> > that you dont know what the hell this is all about so who is really the
jackass.
>> > Kent brockman reporting: "I say they are both jackasses"
>> > I agree Kent.
>> >
>> > Charles Vaughn wrote:
>> >
>> > > Wow, this person certainly has the right to call another person rude.
This is possibly one
>> > > of the most selfish people I have meat on this list. You need to
understand that Zelda 89
>> > > is their game. A controled early beta test is very useful for
finding bugs. I would be
>> > > more than happy to get the game, how ever I will be patient and wait
for the public beta
>> > > test. And you probably won't be able to get it from any of the
testers. CCIA was probably
>> > > smart and didn't give it to jackasses like your self.
>> > >
>> > > Serial wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > oh you must be one of those stupid bastards who banned me from the
#CCIA room on EFnet
>> > > > for no reaso so you can just shut the fuck up bastard, I am talking
to humans who arn't
>> > > > run by your rude ass totaliaristic bastards society so dont talk to
me about beta
>> > > > testers privilages. To all you nice people out there the queestion
rides but send it to
>> > > > me privately now so they dont know who did it and I will post it.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry for the language to all people except the CCIA team.
>> > > >
>> > > > David Martin wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > any testers who give away the beta loose their priveleges
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Serial wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > If anyone has zelda 89 can they please post in on this group.
CCIA said there are
>> > > > > > 10 beta testers and I assume at least one of them is on this
group.
>> > > > > > Thanks a bunch,
>> > > > > > Serial
>
Follow-Ups: