Re: A89: Quitting ASM

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Quitting ASM
From: "Tim Boescke" <boescke@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 19:46:51 -0000
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Nathan Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>
An: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Datum: Samstag, 5. Dezember 1998 18:17
Betreff: Re: A89: Quitting ASM


>
>>Due to the fact that asm is hard, Both plusshell and doorsos compilers
suck
>>equally and don't work, and that only one person has given me help on this
>>list, l'm not going to do anything in asm.  l might even finish the
SimTown
>>Beta game.
>>--TurboSoft
>
>Don't give up, asm is hard and non-intuative but it _really_ teaches you a
>lot.  I admit though, after discovering C/C++ compilers for the 89 I really
>don't do much asm either.
>http://www.mot.com/SPS/HPESD/devprg/frames/members1.html has a list of
>third party venders for the 68000, many of which have free C/C++ compilers.


There is a gcc 68k port for the amiga. Since the ti89 devsystem which are
using A68K
can obviously cope with amiga bin files it is maybe worth a try to adopt it
for the TI89 ?