Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)
Youre right! nobody has the right to say that somebody cant sell their
game but who would buy their game if they dont have the "Great
Organization's" seal of approval? And maybe you dont think it will
happen but who cares if it does maybe we could all benifit from it. I
dont know if you understand the power of the chip we are werking with.
We have the power to make games of VERY high caliber. I have paid for
some gameboy games that really are not of as high quality as some games i
have seen for the 89. Think of it as a way for some of us kid
programmers to make it into a bigger leauge!
-McTwist
P.S. and yes we all must remember this is JUST an idea.
ComAsYuAre@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/4/98 20:19:37 Eastern Standard Time, justin-b@juno.com
> writes:
>
> > The organization idea is very intriguing, but how will the reviewers be
> > compensated for their efforts? Why might they work for free when the
> > programmers whose games they are approving are making money? To account
> > for this, I propose that any programmers submitting thieir games for
> > approval should pay some sort of fee, but no more than $5 or $10. Also,
> > this committee shouldn't be greater than five people, who each review it
> > based on a clear and meaningful definition of excellence.
>
> i say it's all nice in theory but it'll never happen. if somebody wants to
> charge, they have the right to charge. nobody else has the right to say they
> can't, and it's gonna stay that way. besides, it's basically impossible to
> make money off this stuff anyway. you all know right out that nobody's gonna
> pay for a ti calculator game, no matter how good it is. just forget about it.
References: