Re: A89: Proshell

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Proshell
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_HUCK?=" <philhuck@club-internet.fr>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 16:42:47 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


I'm not the author of ProShell, and I don't have the source code. Though, if
I had the source code, I would already have done it !

MP <philhuck@club-internet.fr> <http://mp.ifrance.com>


>
>Now I don't know if you like to talk in questions or if you were asking
>them but just in case I will answer them.(best to my knowlage)
>
>There is a way if you give me the source I will convert it and send it
>back to you, If you want to release it to the public that is your
>busness, but I would have to look at the code to see what needs
>converting.
>
>Elliot
>
>>From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_HUCK?=" <philhuck@club-internet.fr>
>>To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Subject: A89: Proshell
>>Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 20:57:46 +0100
>>Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>>
>>
>>There already was a compatibility problem between Plusshel an DoorsOS,
>but
>>now it is solved. However, is there a way to get Proshell to work with
>the
>>latest release of PS and DO (ie v1.0 and 0.85) ? It can't be converted
>!
>>
>>MP <philhuck@club-internet.fr> <http://mp.ifrance.com>
>>
>>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>