Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)
From: Nathan Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 23:46:39 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19981203233538.0095db60@mail.iland.net>
References: <00c001be1f3d$a2fcdfa0$4d10e6a5@Sammy.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org



>Dux Gregis enlightened me with:
>->
>->well, you know what that means ... you can write a program that will only
>->work on only one calc, relieving the privacy problem of paying for calc
>->programs
>
>so you're saying that the EE pro software that can be bought isn't
>"pirateable?"  or is it?  this is a question i've had for awhile. 

Hmm, I hope not.  I always liked the free softwear comunity.  Selling stuff
wouldn't be any good for us.

	--Nate

Follow-Ups:

A89: Re: Perverted :)

From: Mark Zavislak <felix@megsinet.net>

References:

Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

From: "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

From: --Alex <keymo@stones.com>