Re: A89: problems with util library

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: problems with util library
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 23:49:03 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Which are the "new" libs and which are the old?  I know that there is a big size difference between
the two, but it would be helpful to know which ones to use.

-Miles Raymond

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, November 30, 1998 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: A89: problems with util library


>>The reason Dimension TI isn't is because you need permission from the author
>>in order to change a file and post it.  How would having a converted version
>>next to the original sound?
>
>That sounds like it would help people.  Since permission from the author is
>a problem, I encourge everyone on this list who posted a program using the
>old libs to convert and re-submit it to the appropriate sites.  This
>library issue has been hanging around for too long.
>
> --Nate

Prev: Re: A89: Distubing assembler error
Next: Re: A89: Starting out assembly, need help
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread